I am looking for data on the diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration (FNA) compared to surgical biopsy for subcutaneous masses in cats.
I have seen conflicting information online. Some sources state FNA is 90% accurate, while others suggest it can miss low-grade sarcomas. I have a 9-year-old tortie, Vera, who has arthritis, so I want to avoid unnecessary surgery if possible, but I need to know the reliability of the non-invasive option.
Has anyone here had a mass diagnosed via FNA that was later found to be different upon excision? I am trying to calculate the risk-benefit ratio.